Division of the State of Andhra Prades negates all Constitutional provisions. It would be just like enacting another Partition to ask about 35 Lakh Costal Andhra people living in Hyderabad city to vacate the City branding them as 'Settlers'. This act of formation of Telangana State brings to the fore the failure of New Delhi in implementation of Basic provisions of fundamental rights, especially right to live as a Citizen of India.
Article 371D was invoked by New Delhi in 1973 to resolve the Telangana - Coastal Andhra disputes over appointment to Government Jobs. Accordingly all kinds of regional reservations must end by the year 1980.
Separate Telangana agitation negates Constitutional provision relating to right of Domicile granted by Art 5 in particular.
Jai Telangana ( 1969 ) and Jai Andhra ( 1972 ) movements demanded separation of the State on Regional and Political grounds.
Different yard sticks were agreed upon at different times to solve the local non local disputes and all those time frames have come to an end in 1980.
Whereas, Mulki in fact was promulgated by Nizam against Maharashrtian and Bengali employment in the service of Nizam during 1930s. It has nothing to do with the disputes between Telangana and Costal Andhra people of Andhra Pradesh.
The present day argument is that whoever came to Hyderabad city or Telangana districts are not at all considered to be in public employments as locals.
Negating all Constitutional provisions and Dividing the State and asking about 35 Lakh ( Out of One Crore city’s population ) people residing in Hyderabad who came from Coastal districts of Andhra Pradesh to go back ( to where ? ) would be just like enacting another Partition .
Facts about Earlier decisions regarding employment opportunities to different regions of the State are as follows:-
i) In 1956 Gentlemen agreement it was decided that whoever resides in that part of Telangana or Hyderabad for a continuous period of 12 ( Twelve ) years he must be considered as Local and he is eligible for applying and getting selected for government posts.
ii) Afterwards, in 1973, It was agreed upon , by all MLAs and MLCs of AP Legislature , to reduce the period of Domicile in Telangana or Hyderabad region to 4 (Four ) years in the place of 12 years and that too this restriction is to end in the year 1977 for Hyderabad region and 1980 for Telangana region.
iii) GO No 610 in 1985 was issued by NTR’s Telugu Desam Government to send back the so called non – Telangana people who got employment in Telangana or Hyderabad region.
Issue of such an order is frivolous and absurd given the fact that regional reservations end in 1980 altogether.
As per existing rules and as per Constitution of India provisions regarding Citizenship and distributions of Intra – State employment and educational opportunities are to be dealt with under under Article 371D of Constitution of India ( enacted in the year 1973 , which came into force on 1st july 1974) .
This constitution amendment , exclusive to the State of Andhra Pradesh , authorized State Government to enact laws to provide for equitable opportunities and facilities for the people belonging to different parts of the State in the matter of Public Employment and in the matter of Education. And to resolve any disputes arising out of implementation of orders of the State government Administrative Tribunal exclusively for this purpose is to be created.
And as per Section 80(1) of Code of Civil Procedure if any person or group of persons got any complaint he or they have to first seek redress from the authorities concerned and in failure of getting reply within two months or when he did not get sufficient reply or he feels that his grievance is not addressed well he is at liberty to approach any Court of law with proper jurisdiction.
Any one who is aggrieved or who wants to represent the victims of administrative decisions must use lawful means first .
I am not writing these letters for self interest. But as a Citizen of India I am worried about the people around me and about the future of Indian Union. What the British did when they were driven out of India is being done by a Sikh and an Italian accompanied by selfish Indians. Another partition in India. Decision accepts denial of fundamental rights regarding State of Domicile to Indian Citizens granted in the Constitution of India. If this Partition is not stopped it would lead to far reaching consequences affecting the very basic structure of Indian Republic.
Responses to my letter till 12.8.13 are as follows:
Click on the following LINKS to view my You tube Videos on the issue of,
Click the following buttons to visit my other Websites:
నా ఇతర వెబ్ సైట్లు చూడడానికి ఈ క్రింది బటనులు నొక్కవలెను.
And Nizam's petition against Indian Republic complaining that India occupied his domain in the UN till 1978. What Nizam dreamt of is achieved partially by KCR whose ancestors were lieutenants of Nizam. Let us see what are the consequences of this rebirth of Nizam's domain after 6 decades.
Responses to my letter till 12.8.13 are as follows:
Above two letters were written by me in response to a news item, " Gandhi is an old fool and his character is doubtful, Nizam said", A set of newly declassified files regarding the liberation of Hyderabad in 1948 provides interesting insights into the recent history of Andhra Pradesh, its unification, the end of Nizam's rule and the faultlines that have contributed further to the creation of Telangana.Times of India dt. 3.8.13.